Google’s Hummingbird Update: What’s it mean for users and content producers?

Google’s Hummingbird Update: What’s it mean for users and content producers?

Google’s Hummingbird Update: What’s it mean for users and content producers?

Image: Jaque Davis, Creative Commons

On September 26, Google announced that it had made an update to its algorithm more than a month ago. They’re calling the update Hummingbird, and it affects a reported 90 percent of searches.

Let me save you going back to re-read that last sentence: it affects nine out of every 10 searches. Last year Google handled approximately 1.9 trillion searches. That’s an average of 5.1 billion searches per day, so we can expect Hummingbird to affect around 4.6 billion searches per day, or probably more, if search volume continues to grow as it has in previous years.

How are searches affected? Suppose you search for “Pepsi Center.” You’re probably looking for information such as an address, box office information, and/or upcoming events. With that in mind, Google used to serve you something like this:

Pepsi Center SERP

Brilliant! There’s the phone number and address right up front, which is helpful if I’m sitting in traffic trying to get directions on my phone (NOT while driving… please don’t be stupid), and one click can take me to the calendar of events, box office, or more detailed directions, if I’m not willing to trust Apple Maps on this one. Sitelinks help me get directly to the information I’m most likely looking for, content that’s most popular or relevant on the Pepsi Center website.

But now, you’ll notice more search results that include the view above, as well as this knowledge graph concoction in the right sidebar:

Pepsi Center Site Links

Great for me, the user, because there’s all the information I’m most likely looking for: address, phone number, upcoming events, even some venue trivia, like the fact that it opened in 1999 and holds up to 18,007 people! Google scraped this information directly from the Pepsi Center website, and perhaps other pages as well, but I have no reason to go to those pages now, since my needs have been met.

So what happens when I see that there’s WWE tonight and I get really excited and want to go buy tickets immediately? If I click on the WWE link in the knowledge graph block, I expect I’d be taken somewhere on the Pepsi Center website where tickets to that event are being sold.

NOPE! New Google search:


This is not helpful to my quest to purchase tickets, but it does keep me on for a little longer. Meh.

The Hummingbird update, to be clear, is not an “SEO killer.” Please stop saying SEO is dead. It’s not (this post wins for best photo/caption combo!). In fact, most of us probably didn’t notice any unusual shift in activity over the past month since this update rolled out (and if you did, I’d love to hear about it in the comments!). The goal of Hummingbird is to help Google handle searches more intelligently, and to make results more efficient for the user, but what about the entities who actually produce that content? And I don’t just mean webmasters and copywriters. It takes a village to produce a good website.

Here’s a statement from a Huffington Post article that is concerning to me on two levels:

Besides Hummingbird, Google also announced a few other updates to existing search features aimed at providing information more concisely so people won’t need to navigate to another website. These changes are part of Google’s effort to adapt to the smaller screens of smartphones that aren’t well suited for hopscotching across the Internet.

“So people won’t need to navigate to another website?” That’s the justification? And we’re ok with that? Your company has a website now that Google hopes no one will ever need to visit. They’ll just scrape your data and display it directly to searchers via

Secondly, “these changes are part of Google’s effort to adapt to the smaller screens of smartphones…” Wait, that’s the web designer/developer’s job! Responsive design means your site is accessible via any device. Of course, not all websites are responsive at the moment, but it’s quickly becoming the new norm. But never mind that. Google’s just solved a problem for users trying to access sites that aren’t responsive, but those of us who do have responsive websites (and who have put lots of work into the design and functionality of those sites) will just have to accept that Google gets the first crack at your potential traffic.

I appreciate Google’s ostensible effort to provide information to users more efficiently, but I am more put off by their approach to become the source instead of the messenger. That’s a lot of power to give one company, and exactly the kind of practice that Google has punished other websites for in the past! I love the point Trevin Shirey makes in his post about the update:

… it’s clear what Google is really saying is “We will now scrape more data from 3rd party websites so people never have to leave” Once Google starts fully answering search queries, there is no reason for people to leave Google. With Google crawling and caching nearly every page on the web, they can display snippets and data from web pages that can directly answer informational search queries.

Which, as Trevin also points out, is a hilarious contradiction to their own policy on scraping:

Some webmasters use content taken (“scraped”) from other, more reputable sites on the assumption that increasing the volume of pages on their site is a good long-term strategy regardless of the relevance or uniqueness of that content. Purely scraped content, even from high-quality sources, may not provide any added value to your users without additional useful services or content provided by your site; it may also constitute copyright infringement in some cases. It’s worthwhile to take the time to create original content that sets your site apart. This will keep your visitors coming back and will provide more useful results for users searching on Google.

HAHA! Oh, Google. Make up your mind.

What’s your take on the update? Webmasters, have you noticed any changes in your traffic or user behavior? Users, have you been pleasantly surprised by the improved efficiency of Google’s results lately?

Beyond simple problem solving, I enjoy picking things apart (ideas, communities, websites, roller skates, etc.), finding out what makes them work, and identifying ways to make them work better... Read More


  1. Arif Gangji 4 years ago

    Maybe now I’ll be able to find some decent New York pizza in Denver. I’m pretty sure in a few years I’ll be able to say, “I’m hungry and I want pizza” and they’ll know what I like and who can get it to me the fastest.

    Maybe with Google glass they can see how much of the pie I ate and automatically give the pizza place a star rating. Hmmmm

    • Amy 4 years ago

      People who ate this pizza also searched for Prilosec, “The Itis,” and “how to lose weight.”

      • Arif Gangji 4 years ago

        Now if I were also getting buffalo wings, I would concur.

  2. Rick 4 years ago

    From the perspective of a hardcore Google user, I want my information now. Are you cooking in the kitchen and need to know how may tablespoons in 1/4 cup? Wipe off one finger, fire-up a browser and type “tbsp = 1/4cup” in the search bar. BAM! Back to the mixing bowl. Your mom is flying in but and I forgot which gate …grab your phone, click the Google button and say “united flight 5493” into it. BAM! Detailed flight info. Finally, to use Trevin Shirey’s example; Maybe you have a jonze for a Robin Williams/Vincent Ward joint about death…Google “What Dreams May Come” and click the Google Play link right in the Knowledge Graph, and rent it for two bucks! Of course, the Bacon Number update screwed a bunch of websites that calculate the degrees of Bacon, but I don’t are about them…I want to know how that Charlie Chaplin acted with Walter Walter Matthau in the The Gentleman Tramp, who acted with Kevin Bacon in JFK. BAM! Bacon number = 2; and to learn this, all I had to do was ask. However, every Bacon Number website I’ve ever been to was littered with blinking ads, so points to Google.

    Google is in the business of serving information. Unfortunately, it may not be Company X’s information that gets served. This is why organic search professionals have to continually learn and adapt…because there is a client out there who wants a query like “the movie about moon nazis” to always return Iron Sky.

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Metzger Albee Public Relations is Now!

New name, new look – and the leading-edge communications programs, service and results you've counted on for 25 years!
Watch for our new website, coming soon!